Analysis an argument?

So.. I have to analysis two arguments..1, Meat is delicious, good for health, convenient to get, so people should eat meat.2., It is not moral to kill

So.. I have to analysis two arguments..
1, Meat is delicious, good for health, convenient to get, so people should eat meat.
2., It is not moral to kill animals, raising animals cause environmental problems, and people can still live healthy without eating meat, so people should eat meat.

Can anybody help me to analysis if those two arguments are sound? and why? consider the acceptability, relevance, and adequacy of the premises.
Thx sooooooooooooooooooooo much..

or:So.. I have to analysis two arguments..1, Meat is delicious, good for health, convenient to get, so people should eat meat.2., It is not moral to kill animals, raising animals cause environmental problems, and people can still live healthy without eating meat, so people should eat meat.Can anybody help me to analysis if those two arguments are sound? and why? consider the acceptability, relevance, and adequacy of the premises.Thx sooooooooooooooooooooo much..

or:well the point there is that it is not just meat where we can get protein there are fist it also gives protein and there are also some vegetables that are high in protein like spinach and broccoli

Tags:delicious,