I am mostly Sub-Saharan (east african+ other tribes, even some North African), then European (seems?

I am mostly Sub-Saharan (east african+ other tribes, even some North African), then European (seems to be a lot of Eastern European and some Northern)

I am mostly Sub-Saharan (east african+ other tribes, even some North African), then European (seems to be a lot of Eastern European and some Northern), then Middle Eastern (Iran), then in small percent (10%) Asian ( 5% S.Indian & 5%Taiwanese) and 1-2% Latino, in origin.

In US 1% black use to make you legally black but educated people know that thus law isn't based on biological fact. I don't feel connected to the African-American community. I am not fully "black/African" but I am considered so in US. Would it be ridiculous to identify as "other" or Creole or mixed rather than just merely "black/African"? Wouldn't it be disrespecting my other ancestors not acknowledging them too?

I don't look like Mariah Carey, a "white looking mixed person". Sometimes people, even black have confused mr for East India (India) but just because my facial structure.

or:I am mostly Sub-Saharan (east african+ other tribes, even some North African), then European (seems to be a lot of Eastern European and some Northern), then Middle Eastern (Iran), then in small percent (10%) Asian ( 5% S.Indian & 5%Taiwanese) and 1-2% Latino, in origin.In US 1% black use to make you legally black but educated people know that thus law isn't based on biological fact. I don't feel connected to the African-American community. I am not fully \"black/African\" but I am considered so in US. Would it be ridiculous to identify as \"other\" or Creole or mixed rather than just merely \"black/African\"? Wouldn't it be disrespecting my other ancestors not acknowledging them too?I don't look like Mariah Carey, a \"white looking mixed person\". Sometimes people, even black have confused mr for East India (India) but just because my facial structure.

Tags: