Schiff says January 6 committee will decide what goes in the final report 'in a collaborative manner'

By Daniella Diaz, CNNUpdated: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:44:57 GMTSource: CNNHouse Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who also sits on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrecti

By Daniella Diaz, CNN

Updated: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:44:57 GMT

Source: CNN

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who also sits on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, said Sunday that he doesn't believe the committee's upcoming report would focus almost entirely on Donald Trump.

Schiff, a California Democrat, told CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union," that he doesn't believe a recent Washington Post story about how the contents of the report could potentially leave out investigations in other areas.

"No, I mean -- I certainly hope not," Schiff said. "I would like to see our report be as broad and inclusive as possible. We are discussing as a committee among the members what belongs in the body of the report, what belongs in the appendices of the report, what is beyond the scope of our investigation, and we'll reach those decisions in a collaborative manner."

Schiff also defended the committee in response to a statement from Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney's spokesperson accusing staffers of trying to slip "liberal biases" into the report.

"I don't think the back and forth is particularly helpful to the committee and I don't want to engage in it. We're gonna get to consensus on the report. We're very close to that now. We're close to the putting down the pen," Schiff said.

Bash asked about tension surrounding Cheney, asking Schiff about a quote in the Post story in which one former staffer said that people working for the committee became "discouraged" when they felt the investigation had become a "Cheney 2024 campaign affair."

"I've never viewed it that way," Schiff said, defending Cheney. "And I think her role on the committee has been indispensable. I have tremendous respect for her and for (Illinois Rep.) Adam Kinzinger. They've shown a lot of courage and backbone, something in very short supply in the GOP these days. So the committee would not have been the same without both of their participation and I have nothing but respect for both of them."

Schiff's future

Schiff also responded to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy repeatedly saying he plans to strip Schiff of his committees if he becomes Speaker in the next Congress.

"Kevin McCarthy has no ideology, has no core set of beliefs. It's very hard to not only get to 218 that way, it's even more difficult to keep 218. That's his problem," Schiff said. "So he will misrepresent my record, he'll misrepresent (California Rep.) Eric Swalwell or (Minnesota Rep.) Ilhan Omar, whatever he needs to do to get the votes of the QAnon caucus within his conference."

This comes as McCarthy promised he would strip power from Democrats, vowing to kick Omar off the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Swalwell and Schiff off the House Intelligence Committee.

When asked about comments from Rep. Jim Comer of Kentucky, likely the next chairman of the House Oversight Committee, blaming Schiff for why he doesn't believe in the credibility of congressional investigations, Schiff defended himself.

"Comer doesn't believe in the Russia investigation, he doesn't believe in Ukraine investigation, he doesn't believe in the investigation of January 6. And why? Because those were investigations of the serial abuse of power by Donald Trump. And Comer and (likely next House Judiciary Chairman Jim) Jordan and McCarthy will do nothing but carry Donald Trump's water," Schiff said.

When asked if he would comply with a GOP subpoena in the new Congress, Schiff said: "We'll have to consider the validity of the subpoena. ... But I would certainly view my obligation, the administration's obligation, to follow the law. And the fact that they have disrespected the law is not a precedent I would hope that would be broadly followed, but we'll have to look at the legitimacy or lack of legitimacy in what they do."