Title
Zionism, Globalization and World Government
Go Home
Category
Description
globalization, world government, anglo-american establishment
Address
Phone Number
+1 609-831-2326 (US) | Message me
Site Icon
Zionism, Globalization and World Government
Page Views
0
Share
Update Time
2022-07-06 22:42:23

"I love Zionism, Globalization and World Government"

www.mailstar.net VS www.gqak.com

2022-07-06 22:42:23

Neither Aryan Nor Jew Thissite is for serious researchers of the "higher tribalism" (Aryanism,Zionism, Nihonism etc), Globalization and World Government. I cannotsupport those who deny the common humanity of the different peoples, orwho oppose intermarriage between them. Freedom for the Rich is Slaveryfor the Poor. World Government affects everyone - everyone therefore needsto know about it. Peter Myers. This website was created in Canberra, Australia. Ring meat +61 7 41170125 but not in the middle of the night - I am 10 hours aheadof London (GMT). This index page revised September 2, 2020. Webpages onthe website are individually dated. Bold emphasis added to all files unlessstated otherwise. Write to me at contact.html.You are at http://mailstar.net/index.html. The name of this site is inspired by St. Paul's proclamation "Thereis neither Jew nor Greek". See the commentaryon this text. To join my email list, write to me a at contact.html;use a meaningful subject, so that I can distinguish it from spam. Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of thematerial written by him on this website. If you use it, link to it.Enter this site via File Index (updated) or Subject Indexes(not updated) or Themes (not updated). I hope to update them oneday.File Index (listsfiles with brief description) (updated) Additions (What's New)(updated) This site is fully archived at the Wayback Machine, part of the InternetArchive. By double-clicking on the index page (index.html), you can runthe site as it was then. Initially I used absolute links, but during 2003I switched to relative links.Originally the NANJ site was at /users.cyberone.com.au/myers/. The Cyberonearchive (2001 to Sept 2008) is at https://web.archive.org/web/2013*/users.cyberone.com.au/myers/index.htmlIt was first archived May 23, 2001: https://web.archive.org/web/20010523034822/users.cyberone.com.au/myers/index.htmlMailstar was initially a mirror site for NANJ; but about Sept 22, 2008it became the main site. The Mailstar archive is at https://web.archive.org/web/*/mailstar.net/index.htmlSubject-indexes (not yet updated) : "Higher Tribalism" after the demiseof the Nation-State Aryanism (European Tribalism) & Western CivilizationGlobalization & World Government Zionism (Jewish Tribalism) And/Or CommunismNihonism (Japanese Tribalism) & Asian CivilizationAustraliana About the Author Letters Themes (not yet updated): The standard Marxistview obscures the role of religion as a motivator, e.g. in Zionism. Equally,the Hegelian position obscures the extent to which universal religion concealsparticularist self-interest: Christianity became a mask for Aryanism.As the mask is removed, "White Christians" face a painfulspiritual crisis. The Problem with Whites: whites.html.Denis Freney on the 1971 Springbok tour of Australia. This was a majorsetback for the apartheid regime in South Africa, and a mind-altering eventin Australia: freney.html."The Aryans will enlarge and beautify the earth; but they willsettle to enjoy the world which they created only in the tents of the Jews.These tents are communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhoodof man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society - asociety of free and morally autonomous rational human beings. The destinyof the Aryans is to become Jews" - Rabbi Harry Waton, A ProgramFor The Jews, 1939, p. 102: zioncom.html. "... the Jews sought to revise, redraw, and replace the basictenets of the West" - Ben-Ami Shillony (a Jewish Professor), TheJews and the Japanese, p. 64: japan.html. The One World movement has three factions, which co-operate withone another against "nationalism" or "isolationism".They are (a) the Tory (Imperial) (b) the International Socialist(Trotskyist, Fabian & Green Left, against the StalinistLeft) (c) the Zionist: british-conspiracy.html.The first delivers the "Right", the second delivers the "Left"to One-Worldism: oneworld.html. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 marked the joining-up of the Tory andZionist factions in an uneasy alliance. Before that, they were workingagainst each other (Britain was pro-Czar, the Zionists were anti-Czar).The International Socialist faction is also what H. G. Wells called"the Open Conspiracy": opensoc.html.It promotes Political Correctness, the World Court, and the Kyoto Protocol.It tried to get a world government established at the Peace Conferenceof Versailles in 1919: toolkit3.html, and alsovia the Baruch Plan for World Government, in 1946: baruch-plan.html.This faction mounted the Bolshevik Revolution: lenin-trotsky.html.Isaac Deutscher wrote in Russia After Stalin, "During theearly years of the Soviet regime, the Bolshevik leaders hadthe feeling that they were Marxists in partibus infidelium, WestEuropean revolutionaries acting against a non-congenial Oriental background... " (p. 32): beria.html. They were overthrown by Stalin, who gave them a dose of their own medicine:stalin.html. The Baruch Plan was supported by anti-Stalinist communists like AlbertEinstein (einstein.html), but the plan itselfwas drafted by the Zionist banker Bernard Baruch, of Wall Street (on whomsee freedman.html). So here one sees the joining of the Zionist & Trotskyist forces.However, Stalin was running the USSR at the time ... and so, thesynchronisation of the World Government forces did not happen. A laterattempt was made under the name of "Convergence": convergence.html.The Soviet Union fell because Gorbachev belongs to the InternationalSocialist faction; he was undoing Stalin's conquests, and trying to forma Single World Civilization. This was impeded because during his rule theUS & Britain were in Tory hands (Reagan, Thatcher, Bush snr). The Left faction opposes the current War against Israel's enemies, butpretends that it is about oil (instead of religion). Whale and Elephant The Tory faction was the traditional Anglo-American Establishment: quigley.html.This "British" grouping might be called the whale, becauseit controls the oceans (via bases scattered around the world). The Zionistone is called the elephant, the one you can't see in the china shopuntil you join up the dots. Some people can't see the whale; some can't see the elephant. The Balfour Declaration marked the joining-up of thesetwo (up to that point separate) conspiracies: l-george.html.The British one had wanted to get the US back into the Empire, evenif that meant transferring the capital to the US. In the end, they wereonly able to do that with the assistance of Jewish middlemen. Before the Balfour Declaration, the two conspiracies were workingagainst each other. It was in the Zionist interest to keep the protagonistsin World War I as evenly balanced as possible, i.e. keep the US out ofthe war, until the fall of the Tsar, their hated enemy. Then they auctionedtheir support to the protagonists. Suppose that the U.S. had entered the war earlier, and mobilized itstroops and sent them to the front. Then Britain would not have made theBalfour Declaration, as "a contract with World Jewry", wherebyZionists got Palestine in return for getting the U.S. into the war - becausethe U.S. would already have tilted the balance. The catch was this: the Zionist one knew about the Tory one, becauseCecil Rhodes had invited Lord Rothschild to join it; but the Tories didnot know about the Zionist one: rhodes-will.html.The conspirators control the major media, but there was a time, in 1917-9,when the anti-Zionist media proprietor Lord Northcliffe tried to go hisown way. The conspirators evicted him, even though he was chief proprietorof The Times, and he died mysteriously soon after: toolkit3.html.The "War on Terror" is a new Crusade: it's about religion,not Oil. In the Islamic countries that are invaded and occupied, oil pipelinesetc will be sabotaged by the resistance. The Oil industry would not riskthe Empire for so little benefit. The "Left Opposition", i.e. the Trotskyist, Fabian& Green forces, oppose the War, but by saying that it's only aboutOil, cover up the religious factor: the push by the Zionists to"restore Solomon's kingdom" and build the Third Temple (wherethe Dome of the Rock now stands). Islam is in the way: tmf.html.The "Left Opposition" is the "Open Conspiracy":opensoc.html. It tried to make a World Governmentout of the League of Nations: wells-lenin-league.html.It has given us "Gay Rights" and destroyed our family life, ashappened in the early (pre-Stalin) period of the Soviet Union: sex-soviet.html.Stalin ruined the plot. By distracting from the religious motive, the "Left Opposition"act as "gatekeepers" for the Zionists. Noam Chomsky isthe leader today: cia-infiltrating-left.html.He praises Israel Shahak and Norman Finkelstein. Shahak discloses the danger of the Jewish religion: shahak1.html.But on his website (archive), Chomsky never once mentions Shahak's evidencethat religion is an important factor. Similarly with Norman Finkelstein, who wrote a book called The HolocauastIndustry: finkelstein.html. Chomsky,at his website, despite praising Finkelstein as a Left activist, neveronce mentions the expression "holocaust industry": http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/.Western Civilization seems to be dying: the older generationis being prevented (by the "Open Conspirators") from transmittingit to the younger generation. We're going through something like Mao'sCultural Revolution, with its attack on the "Four Olds". Butwas there ever such a thing as "Western Civilization"? Was itsomething Europe invented to justify White Dominance? transciv.html.Is Zionism allied with Liberal Internationalism, or with Communism?Was Stalin murdered? death-of-stalin.htmlWas there a Cold War between Moscow and Jerusalem, over which wouldbe the centre of a socialist world? zioncom.html.Jewish-Asian engagements: Propagandists vs. Technocrats: Jewish "Software" versusJapanese "Hardware": japan.html.An encounter between religious Jews and Tibetan Buddhists reveals muchabout the inner life of both. The Jew in the Lotus: lotus.html.Is there a struggle between the two great accumulators of Capital -Jewish and Asian? Was this what the "Asia Crisis" was reallyabout? asia-crisis.html. The Jews are not a "race" or a "nation" but a religion:japan.html. However, there is a non-theistic variantof the Jewish religion (just as Buddhism in an atheistic religion): philos.html.David Ben-Gurion, for example, was an atheist, who nevertheless thoughtthat Jews had a mission, ordained by the Bible, to "unify the world"and (by building the Third Temple) to "bring light to the Gentiles":bengur-bible.html. The attack on the World Trade Centre - was Mossad behind it, to getthe West to fight Islam? wtc.html Willit lead to a world war over the Dome of the Rock (to build the Third Templein its place)? dome.html. Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad agent, on how Mossad tricked Americainto bombing Libya: ostrovsky.html. The Multi-Function Polis (MFP), a high-tech city of the future,was proposed in 1987 by Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry,to be built in Australia: the MFP Saga.Where did the "APEC" idea come from? It suggests anamalgamation of George Orwell's Oceania and Eastasia spheres (from hisbook 1984). Orwell, a Trotskyist of the nicer kind, got the ideaof the three world-zones from James Burnham's book The Managerial Revolution(Burnham was also a Trotskyist, who became a leading anti-Communist duringthe Cold War): burnham.html. Chalmers Johnson said that APEC was "a cover for Australia's joiningAsia"; Samuel Huntington said that Australia was trying to defectfrom Western to Eastasian civilization. David Ben Gurion articulated hisJewish-centred version of APEC in 1962: bengur62.jpg. This website is dedicated to Ben Chifley (1885 - 1951) and Bob Santamaria(1915-1998). Chifley created Australia's postwar socialist economy. "Socialism"meant public ownership, not "Gay Marriage" as it does in theseTrotskyist times.Trots talk of "Socialism", but they stand for Communist Dictatorshipand World Government.Chifley would have none of that; his Socialism was a mixed economy,such that McEwen and Menzies saw fit to continue it. They deserve commendationfor that. The Trots and other Communists helped bring Chifley down via the CoalStrike.The author outside Chifley's house in Bathurst, NSW, in 2010: Chifley-house-Bathurst-2010.jpg.Chifley was able to contain the opposing tendencies within the LaborParty, but his successor, Evatt, naively accepted Soviet assurances overthe defection of Vladimir Petrov and the abduction of his wife Evdokia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrov_Affair.This happened just after the fall of Beria; a recall to Moscow was commonlythe prelude to execution.Evatt split the ALP - not Santamaria. But Santamaria was blamed. Later,as Hawke & Keating privatized & deregulated the Socialist economyChifley had set up, Santamaria stood steadfast in defence of it.More on Australia's socialist economy is at xLeague.html.Its dismantling is described at xTrots.html andambivalence.html."The man blamed for the ALP split in the 1950s was the onlynational figure to stand by Labor's core values" - Clyde Cameron,Labor MHR & Minister in the Whitlam Government. More from Cameron: "No other person had such an influence on the political scene asSantamaria during the last 50 years of his life; and no other politicalfigure engendered the same devotion from his followers, or fear from hisopponents. In fact, it is also true to say that no other figure commandedthe same lasting respect from both friend and foe." Bob Santamaria - the Battler's Friend: santamaria.html.Anthropologist David Maybury-Lewis wrote in his book Millenium: TribalWisdom and the Modern World (Viking Penguin, New York, 1992): "The ancient Egyptians believed that a totality must consistof the union of opposites. A similar premise, that the interactionbetween yin (the female principle) and yang (the male principle)underlies the workings of the universe, is at the heart of much Chinesethinking. The idea has been central to Taoist philosophy from the fourthcentury B.C. to the present day {p. 126} and is still embraced by manyChinese who are not Taoists. Nor is the idea confined to the Egyptiansand the Chinese. Peoples all over the world, in Eurasia, Africa andthe Americas, have come to the conclusion that the cosmos is a combiningof opposites and that one of the most important aspects of this dualismis the opposition between male and female." (p. 125). Feminism is based on a denial of that sexual polarity and complementarity.We need a new Engagement between the Sexes: engagement.html.To survive amid nihilism one must find a philosophy. Here's mine: Once grasp the great Form without form And you roam where you will With no evil to fear Calm, peaceful, at ease. At music and viands The wayfarer stops. But the Way, when declared Seems thin and so flavorless! It is nothing to look at And nothing to hear; But used, it will prove Inexhaustible. - Tao Te Ching,poem 35, tr. R. B. Blakney as The Way of Life. Knowledge frequently results from knowing others, but the man who is awakened, has seen the uncarved block. Others might be mastered by force, but to master one's self requires the Tao. He who has many material things, may be described as rich, but he who knows he has enough, and is at one with the Tao, might have enough of material things, and have self-being as well. Will-power may bring perseverance; but to have tranquility is to endure, being protected for all his days. He whose ideas remain in the world, is present for all time. - Tao Te Ching,poem 33, tr. S. Rosenthal. Henry C K Liu on Taoism and Modernity: daoist.html.Readers who study this site thoroughly will realise that a certain amountof contradictory material is presented. That's because the truth is notalways clear; and also because it's beneficial to "read around thetopic", seeing a variety of viewpoints. There's a story from India about four blind-folded men feeling an elephant.One felt the trunk, one the tail, one a leg, one another part. Each gota different impression. You and I empathise with these four men because, unlike them, we "see"the elephant, as "privileged" observers. But in this website,I do not "see" the elephant; I am blindfolded like those fourmen. However, I am privileged to be able to interview each of them, andto assemble their impressions of the elephant. The elephant, then, represents the machinations behind the scenes. In the face of the "dumbing-down" of intellectual standards,the aim of this website is to lift up, to bring to the reader insightsfrom penetrating writers unknown except to a few experts - people likeS.G.F. Brandon (judgment.html) and Cyrus H.Gordon (gordon.html). The public needs such informationfor informed debate. In no sense is the quoting here a substitute for obtainingthe books themselves: footnotes, bibliography etc (essential for any thoroughresearch - and these are serious books, for those interested in research)are omitted in nearly all cases; in those rare cases where footnotes aresupplied, only selected ones are. This site is intended to entice the readerto follow up the works of those authors; the juxtaposition of these writers,and the differences between their viewpoints, are hopefully a stimulusto further examination and independent thought. Intellectual life thrivesnot when we all sing the same chorus, but when divergent yet well-arguedcases present us with further problems to solve. There is no consistent, ideological, "editorial line" at thissite. The disparity in viewpoints within the material featured is due,more than any other reason, to the incompleteness of our knowledge, andthe need not to miss vital information by excluding informed but sometimesdisagreeable accounts. Feel free to send me contrary material, if you areprepared to engage in examination and discussion with me. There is no counter on this site: I have chosen not to monitor my readersin any way. I have no idea how many find the site useful; therefore I relyon your letters, to let me know. Copyright: Peter Gerard Myers asserts the right to be identifiedas the author of the material written by him on this website, beingmaterial that is not otherwise attributed to another author.Write to me (Peter Myers) at contact.html.Donations to this website are welcome. You can make a donation via Paypal,to my email address, which you will find at at contact.html.